Bigger babies: what happens in real practice in a non-academic UK center? Detection accuracy and outcomes with induction

No Thumbnail Available
Authors
Barker, Katie
Issue Date
2024
Type
Article
Language
en
Keywords
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Alternative Title
Abstract
Background: There is emerging evidence of improved outcomes with induction of labour for pregnancies in which the baby is thought to be large. This trial identifies scan accuracy and the effect of intervention for pregnancies complicated by suspected large for gestational age (LGA) on customized chart outside an academic center. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of 3 groups of induced pregnancies; women with a suspected LGA fetus, women with diabetes (DM) and a control group (C) of women that underwent induction of labour on or after 280 days gestation. Data collection and analysis were prespecified. Scan accuracy and outcomes between the cohorts were compared. Results: Over 1 year there were 845 cases: LGA (128), DM (116) and control cases (601). Mean birthweights differed significantly. PPV of EFW for birthweight >90th centile on GROW chart, WHO chart, and >4 kg was 0.35-0.40. Projected birthweight of >4 kg significantly better predicted itself (AUROC 0.70, 0.74 and 0.80). Mean scan error was -5.2% and +15.6% for DM and LGA. Shoulder dystocia and neonatal morbidity were not increased in LGA despite the significant increase in AVD 28/128, 21.9% vs. 99/601, 16.5%, aOR 2.20 (1.07-4.5). SVD was significantly less likely LGA vs. C at 69/128, 53.9% vs. 413/601, 68.7% aOR 0.38 (95% CI: 0.21-0.70). Conclusions: Third trimester EFW for bigger babies was poorly predictive of macrosomia. Fetal outcomes were good but women selected and induced as LGA had higher rates of hemorrhage and intervention.
Description
Citation
Simpson, B., Barker, K., Parnell, L. and Waring, G.J. (2024) Bigger babies: what happens in real practice in a non-academic UK center? Detection accuracy and outcomes with induction. Minerva Obstetrics and Gynecology; 76(4) : 305-311.
Publisher
Minerva Obstetrics and Gynecology
License
Journal
Volume
Issue
PubMed ID
ISSN
2724-6450
EISSN